logo

News

November 5, 2025

Study Optimizes Dromader Aircraft for Wildfire Suppression

Forest fires, with their sudden onset and devastating destructive power, pose a significant threat to ecosystems and public safety. The challenge of combating these blazes efficiently and precisely remains a critical focus in firefighting research. Among various suppression methods, aerial firefighting has become indispensable due to its rapid response and extensive coverage capabilities.

Western Pilot Services' Dromader aircraft, originally designed as an agricultural sprayer, has emerged as an unexpected hero in this battle. Through careful modifications, this versatile plane has been transformed into an effective tool against wildfires. This article examines the Dromader's performance in ground tests under various operational conditions, providing scientific guidance to enhance firefighting efficiency and reduce damage.

The Dromader: Agricultural Workhorse Transformed Into Firefighting Asset

Built for durability with exceptional low-altitude performance and substantial payload capacity, the Dromader found its original purpose in crop dusting. For firefighting applications, technicians typically equip the aircraft with one of two gate systems: Transland or Melex. These systems differ primarily in their opening size and flow rate.

The Melex gate features an expansive 656-square-inch opening (41x18 inches) capable of delivering an impressive 450 gallons per second. In contrast, the Transland system offers a more modest 390-square-inch opening (39x10 inches) with an 80-gallon-per-second flow rate. Both mechanically operated systems maintain simplicity and reliability. With a 500-gallon liquid tank capacity, pilots typically release the entire load in a single pass during firefighting operations.

Rigorous Testing Under the WFCS Program

The Wildland Fire Chemical Systems (WFCS) project subjected the Dromader to exhaustive testing to evaluate its fire suppression capabilities. This comprehensive program assesses fixed-wing and rotary aircraft performance across various fuel types and fire conditions to determine optimal ground coverage parameters.

Tests examined multiple flight variables including airspeed (ranging from 74 to 96 knots, approximately 85 to 110 mph) and drop altitude (with gate heights from 40 to 120 feet above ground). Researchers evaluated three distinct suppressants: water, foam, and gel retardant. These rigorous trials aimed to establish the aircraft's optimal performance envelope across diverse scenarios.

Ground Tests: Mapping Suppressant Distribution Patterns

The Missoula Technology and Development Center conducted meticulous ground tests using an array of plastic containers (similar to Cool Whip bowls) arranged in grid patterns across flat terrain. After each test drop, technicians measured liquid accumulation in each container to precisely map coverage patterns.

Results demonstrated significant impacts from flow rate, drop height, and airspeed on suppressant distribution. Given the Dromader's operation within specific altitude and speed ranges with fixed flow rates for each gate system, the data primarily reflects average delivery performance.

Key Factors Influencing Suppressant Coverage
  • Flow Rate: The Melex system's higher flow rate creates broader coverage but risks uneven distribution if not properly managed. The Transland system offers more concentrated delivery for targeted applications.
  • Drop Altitude: Higher releases promote wider dispersion but increase susceptibility to wind interference. Lower altitudes provide more precise placement with reduced coverage area.
  • Airspeed: Faster speeds elongate coverage patterns along the flight path, while slower speeds produce denser, narrower bands. Optimal speed balances coverage continuity with adequate concentration.
Suppressant Characteristics and Applications
  • Water: The most economical and readily available option, though limited by rapid evaporation and lower effectiveness against intense fires.
  • Foam: Forms an oxygen-blocking layer over fuels, offering superior adhesion and evaporation resistance at higher cost and potential environmental impact.
  • Gel Retardant: Enhanced water viscosity improves adherence and heat resistance, particularly effective when combined with fire retardants, though more expensive and potentially corrosive.
Fuel-Specific Coverage Recommendations

The National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) and Fire Behavior Fuel Model classify vegetation types to determine required retardant coverage levels (measured in gallons per 100 square feet). Highly flammable grass fuels demand greater coverage than denser woody materials, guiding pilots in load planning and drop strategies.

Operational Optimization Strategies
  • Select gate systems based on fire size and fuel characteristics
  • Adjust drop altitude according to wind conditions and fuel type
  • Modify airspeed relative to fire spread rate and fuel distribution
  • Choose suppressants appropriate for fire intensity and environmental conditions
  • Continuously monitor conditions and adjust parameters accordingly
Conclusion: Advancing Aerial Firefighting Through Technology

The comprehensive testing of Western Pilot Services' Dromader aircraft provides valuable insights into optimized aerial firefighting techniques. These findings equip frontline crews with scientifically validated operational guidelines, enhancing suppression effectiveness while minimizing ecological and economic impacts. As technological advancements continue to refine aerial firefighting capabilities, such research ensures these vital tools meet the growing challenges of wildfire management.

Contact Details